What we don’t know and who wants it to stay that way

A few days ago the liberal New York Times with a two year history of supporting the official US government Covid narratives published an unusual article

“The C.D.C. Isn’t Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects”

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html?searchResultPosition=2

Sound familiar? Here in NZ you have to go through a complicated process of separating historical data from the cumulative reports our Ministry of Health publishes, you then discover what the current situation is—Omicron is affecting the vaccinated proportionately more than the unvaccinated. Why would our Ministry of Health be concerned to hide this from us?

You may not be surprised to learn that there is a global effort to make sure the information we receive is heavily slanted towards a continuing programme of mRNA vaccinations for all. Two days ago I sent a letter to Paul Hunt, Chief Commissioner for Human Rights in NZ. With Dr Hunt’s permission this letter has been widely circulated.

https://hatchardreport.com/response-to-paul-hunt-chief-nz-human-rights-commissioner/

Today I received an email from Australia with some pushback. Apparently a kindly GP over the ditch wanted to point out that my letter was inaccurate and I was a prime example of the ‘unscientific’ thinkers questioning the wisdom of vaccination. He cited what he referred to as a ‘large study’.

So I clicked on the link and came to not a ‘large study’ but a newsletter published by ‘Health Desk’. Health Desk described itself as an initiative of ‘Meedan’. Meedan is an organisation devoted to strengthening global journalism by uncovering ‘misinformation’. Meedan undertakes cooperative ventures with the Google News Initiative to develop machine learning technologies in order to mine social media and create ‘fact checkers’. Probably the same fact checkers that delete any posts from social media sites which raise questions about Covid vaccination safety and deaths. Including the deletion of published papers from reputable scientific journals such as the BMJ. This is a case of AI machines programmed by people to promote their agenda.

Meedan is founded and supported by Pierre Omidyar, co-founder of eBay. Omidyar Foundation is allied with many organisations. Among its largest financial contributors are the World Bank and the World Economic Forum. Meedan is also supported by the Robert Wood Foundation, a 13 billion dollar US foundation devoted exclusively and rather vaguely to healthcare coverage.

Health Desk states that its purpose is to serve journalists worldwide by publicising content about Covid-19 vaccination created by Science Media Centres in order to counter ‘misinformation’. Science Media Centre (SMC) was first set up in 2002 in the UK to counter opposition to GM crops. It has since blossomed into a global science lobbying service with outlets in many countries (including NZ). It is supported by among others AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Dupont, and Welcome all of whom are possibly known to you as global pharmaceutical organisations.

I quickly found that the article in Health Desk contained exactly the same ‘errors’ that our Ministry of Health is making. The latest Covid data is confounded with historical data in order to make it appear that unvaccinated individuals are more vulnerable to Covid-19 infection and hospitalisation, whereas with Omicron the reverse is true. It might not have escaped your notice that there is a potential benefit to pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer and AstraZeneca if the myth of Covid mRNA vaccine efficacy could be perpetuated.

So why would our Ministry of Health and Medsafe cooperate with this drivel? Medsafe itself is locked into an ‘information’ system similar to SMC with a close association to the pharmaceutical industry—the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA). ICMRA sends out Covid policy advice to Medsafe via a global database. Just as Science Media Centres began with a mission to support GM crops and thereby oppose natural crops, ICMRA began with a mission that called for the extreme regulation of herbal medicine and natural products.

My critic from Australia finished his assessment by referring to the advice of the Royal College of Australian GPs, which also appeared to be curated by the global pharmaceutical lobby. I reflected that busy GPs probably have little time to research original papers published in learned journals, they are left with digests of misleading information produced by official sounding but actually private international bodies with commercial agendas who have long since lost touch with actual research findings and the basics of health.

As a result of this type of lobbying, medical misadventure became the third leading cause of death, and now our government has mandated the most dangerous and deadly medicine in history for all, including even our children. My point is that our health service has been co-opted by foreign commercial interests that do not have the health of the nation at heart. As a result, we are suffering a tsunami of adverse health effects. We must speak up now and free our health service from this novel untested biotechnology madness.

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)